Consultation draft of specific requirements to support FSA-MTP101 friction ridge detail: comparison (accessible)
Updated 23 August 2024
This is a draft document for consultation and its content may change. It should not be taken to represent the Regulator鈥檚 view until final publication.
106.听听听听听听贵谤颈肠迟颈辞苍 ridge detail: comparison
106.1听听听听听听听听听听听听 Scope
106.1.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The fingers, palms of the hand, toes and the soles of the feet comprise an intricate system of friction ridges and furrows, which are known as friction ridge skin. The arrangement and sequencing of characteristics within friction ridge skin are extremely variable between individuals, persist throughout life and are accepted as a reliable means of human identification.
106.1.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Friction ridge detail is an area comprising the combination of friction ridge flow, friction ridge characteristics, and friction ridge structure to include other features such as creases. It is the examination of these characteristics and features that form the basis of the forensic science activity of friction ridge detail comparison defined in this Code. The undertaking of friction ridge detail comparison shall include all areas of friction ridge detail on the human body and take an holistic approach.
106.1.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The method is the end to end process for each activity. ACE is the technical framework (test) that facilitates the activity.
106.1.4聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 These FSA specific requirements establish the specific requirements for friction ridge detail examination within the context of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 and the Code and ILAC G19:06/2022. They set out the basis on which accreditation is achieved for undertaking this FSA. The Regulator will produce guidance to support effective regulation of this FSA including terminology used in friction ridge detail comparison
106.1.5聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall recognise that friction ridge detail analysis and comparison activities are part of the friction ridge detail end-to-end workflow (recovery to final report) and are reliant on the quality of the product from upstream processes.
106.2听听听听听听听听听听听听 Defining the Scope of Accreditation
106.2.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The scope of accreditation for organisations which undertake friction ridge detail comparison should be defined on the basis that material tested is friction ridge detail. The type of activity in which ACE is used should be described as;
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Searching
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 identity check
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 scene linking
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 direct comparison
106.2.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The activities undertaken shall reference documented in house methods that have been validated in line with the requirements of the Code.
106.3听听听听听听听听听听听听 Personnel ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 6.2, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clauses 3.3 and 4.8.3
Practitioner competence
106.3.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have practitioners, recognising the different areas of competence required for a range of tasks within the workflow, and shall establish a competency assessment framework for new (including those with previous experience) and existing practitioners. This framework shall include:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 the ongoing process of training, assessment and review to ensure the maintenance of practitioner competence; and
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 the process for managing and supporting practitioners whose competence has lapsed.
106.3.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The details of a structured training programme to attain initial competence and a programme of assessment to demonstrate ongoing competence shall be documented.
106.3.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Competency assessment shall include all comparison activities and the use of any automated fingerprint identification system (AFIS). Assessment of initial and ongoing competence shall be objective and therefore include items of known outcomes from all areas of friction ridge detail, utilising ground truth data.
106.4听听听听听听听听听听听听 Technical records ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.5, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clause 3.5
106.4.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have procedures for the production of technical records, including recording examination notes contemporaneously in a format and with a level of detail that is clear and auditable.
106.4.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Procedures shall define and reference the documentation (also referred to as case notes) associated with the friction ridge detail workflow process.
106.4.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 All records shall include the date they were made and the identity of the individual responsible for each entry. Technical records shall, as a minimum, demonstrate the examination sequence and include:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 a unique reference number;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 records of materials used in the course of the analysis and examination;
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 records of the analysis and examination;
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 sequence of recording contemporaneous notes;
e.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 results/outputs;
f.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 reporting outcomes of the fingerprint examinations; and
g.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 records of communication.
106.5听听听听听听听听听听听听 Accommodation and environmental conditions ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 6.3, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clauses 3.11 and 3.12
106.5.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The workspace and equipment used for fingerprint comparison shall be fit for the effective carrying out of the FSA. This should include an appropriate environment with suitable lighting.
Equipment
106.5.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The requirements for computers and automated equipment are set out in the Code at section 32.1.
106.5.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have procedures for the control, maintenance, and performance checking of critical equipment. Maintenance and performance checks shall be recorded.
106.6听听听听听听听听听听听听 Methods and method validation ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.2.2, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clause 3.10
General considerations
106.6.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have documented procedures describing the FSA sub-activities of FSA-MTP101 it undertakes encompassing the workflow from receipt to reporting.
106.6.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The examination process shall consist of the stages referred to as analysis, comparison and evaluation (ACE) and apply to all sources of friction ridge detail. All sources shall be included in the validation exercises.
106.6.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 ACE can be followed by a verification stage (ACE-V). This process provides a structure for the verification of friction ridge detail examination results. Verification requires an independent examination of the original material; it is an independent application of ACE.
106.6.4聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The process for verification shall also be documented in the forensic unit鈥檚 procedures.
106.6.5聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Verification can be blind or open, and the circumstances where these options are used shall be clearly defined in the forensic unit鈥檚 procedures.
106.6.6聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall clearly define and document a procedure for the management of circumstances where a variance in practitioner opinion has arisen.
Use of an automated fingerprint identification system in friction ridge detail examination
106.6.7聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Where an AFIS is used the forensic unit shall have good practice guidance in order to achieve optimal performance. This guidance shall, as a minimum:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Understand the model/basis of the search method employed;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Understand the performance of the system鈥檚 friction ridge detail auto encode function against manual encoding by practitioners;
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Understand the efficiency (i.e. success rate) of the search method to return the appropriate respondent ;
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Understand the type (quality/sufficiency) of friction ridge detail where the appropriate respondent is not returned from one-to-many searches;
e.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Determine the re-launch strategies (manual and/or automated) for negative outcomes to address the incidence of false negative outputs;
f.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Determine the number of respondents for conducting manual comparisons to manage the risk of not identifying the appropriate candidate if different from the AFIS default;
g.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Process relevant results from an AFIS search in accordance with the established verification procedures. On-screen verification is acceptable providing that a documented audit trail is available; and
h.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Controls for managing the risk presented by updates to software for AFIS; and
i.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Understand the limitations of the system
106.7听听听听听听听听听听听听 Validation ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.2.2, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clause 3.10
106.7.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall ensure that it has staff that are competent to develop appropriate validation plans to include the specific activities undertaken and completion of an appropriate validation with further validation and/or periodic validation review as required.
106.7.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Validation shall be reviewed at least once within an accreditation cycle to evidence that methods remain fit for purpose and shall be reviewed when elements of the process are subject to change.
106.7.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Significant changes to procedures, or equipment, shall be considered in a validation review and subject to validation or verification.
106.7.4聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Validation shall be undertaken by the forensic unit to ensure the reliability of reported outcomes.
106.7.5聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The validation exercise shall incorporate impressions of known source friction ridge detail, including photographs of friction ridge skin where appropriate. In addition to the process detailed in section 28 of the Code, it shall include:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 samples representative of the quality and variability of friction ridge detail typically encountered within each activity;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 procedures to ensure that the system delivers expected results;
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 some form of measure of uncertainty;
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 determination of the performance and limitations of the practitioner and equipment; and
106.7.6聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Where digital images are relied on, the validation shall consider optimum capture and transfer parameters and manage the risk of any compromise in quality.
106.7.7聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Where an AFIS is used, the forensic unit shall either validate or verify the performance by using ground truth data of varying quality and representative of the range of friction ridge detail typically encountered in casework.
106.8听听听听听听听听听听听听 Estimation of uncertainty of measurement ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.6,
106.8.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Procedures shall be in place to estimate the uncertainty in the method under consideration. This could include, but not be limited to consideration of:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 human factors;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 procedures;
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 application of digital tools used within the ACE process; and
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 equipment for digital and manual processes.
106.8.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Error rates can be determined initially from the validation of the methods and processes to assess consistency and variances of opinion.
106.8.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The uncertainty of measurement shall be reviewed using data from scheduled dip sampling, quality control, and competence and proficiency tests.
106.9听听听听听听听听听听听听 Control of data ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.11
106.9.1聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Procedures shall be in place to protect, secure, control, review and retain the data generated by the forensic unit; these may relate to:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 case management systems;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 AFIS;
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 digital image transfer and storage systems; and
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 digital comparison software.
106.9.2聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have policies and procedures in place for the digital capture, storage, retrieval, display and transmission of images used as evidence. The method(s) used shall maintain the identity, security, integrity and continuity of the data.
106.9.3聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 An audit trail shall be created upon receipt and maintained with the image(s). The original image shall be retained securely, and any image processing and enhancement shall be carried out on a duplicate.
106.10听听听听听听听 Sampling ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.3, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clause 4.3.3
106.10.1聽聽聽聽聽 Sampling in this context relates to case assessment leading to the appropriate selection and targeting of comparisons to facilitate reporting of results based on risk and the needs of the investigation.
106.10.2聽聽聽聽聽 The criteria for the selection of the friction ridge detail shall be determined by the relevance of the item/exhibit and consideration given to the quality of the friction ridge detail. This shall be recorded within the contemporaneous notes.
106.10.3聽聽聽聽聽 If any friction ridge detail is not subject to analysis, the reason for this shall be documented.
106.11听听听听听听听 Handling of items ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.4 ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clauses 3.5 and 4.7.7.2
106.11.1聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have a documented item acceptance and rejection policy as set out in the Code.
106.11.2聽聽聽聽聽 Procedures detailing the storage and preservation of the media on which the friction ridge detail is recorded shall be documented.
106.11.3聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have a documented procedure setting out how the continuity of the item is established and recorded.
106.11.4聽聽聽聽聽 Any adjustments made to optimise the appearance of the friction ridge detail shall be made to a working copy of it. The friction ridge detail shall be retained in the format in which it was originally retrieved.
106.11.5聽聽聽聽聽 An audit trail shall be available to track the continuity of all case-related items/exhibits.
106.12听听听听听听听 Assuring the quality of results ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 8.1.1 Option A
106.12.1聽聽聽聽聽 Forensic units shall have documented procedures for verification.
106.12.2聽聽聽聽聽 Forensic units shall have a documented procedure for the application of critical findings checks relevant to each of the activities set out at 106.2.1. and shall include an element of blind checking.
106.12.3聽聽聽聽聽 In recognising that practitioners may be influenced in their decisions by contextual information, forensic units shall have processes and procedures in place to safeguard against the risk of cognitive bias and influence. Such processes could include, but not necessarily be limited to:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 use of blind examination/verification; and
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 training and awareness
106.12.4聽聽聽聽聽 Forensic units shall participate in suitable ILC, collaborative exercises and/or PT programmes. A plan for the level and frequency of participation, and for assessing the resulting outcomes and opportunities for learning and development, shall be documented.
106.12.5聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall determine a quality control process for reviewing decisions of insufficient detail for search or comparison.
106.12.6聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall determine a quality control process for where nominated candidates have been entirely excluded as the source of any of the friction ridge detail.
106.12.7聽聽聽聽聽 Procedures shall cover the provision of guidance and feedback to the friction ridge detail recovery and visualisation practitioners based on the quality of the submissions received; this might include what and how to prepare the friction ridge detail (lift, photograph or digital image) for subsequent processing.
106.12.8聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have a monitoring process to identify trends and issues amongst practitioners.
Variance of opinion
106.12.9聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have a policy and procedure to deal with differences of opinion amongst practitioners, including a feedback mechanism for individuals involved.
106.12.10聽 Where there is an external challenge, a potential error, or conflicting opinions, the process shall include, as a minimum, a fully documented :
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 linear ACE report, which shall record all observations at the analysis stage and interpretation of the friction ridge detail by all practitioners involved in the examination;
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 findings and conclusions reached by all practitioners involved in the examination; and
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 process used to reach a consensus on an agreed outcome.
106.12.11聽 An error should not be confused with a difference of opinion. When an error has been established, either technical or administrative, a non-conformance shall be raised.
106.13听听听听听听听 Reporting the results ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.8, ILAC-G19:06/2022 Clause 4.9
Reporting outcomes
106.13.1聽聽聽聽聽 The comparison of friction ridge detail is a cognitive process that relies on the competence of the practitioners to perform examinations and analyses, and form conclusions based on the outcomes. The conclusions drawn shall be made based on their training, skill and experience; the basis for these conclusions shall be traceable and clearly evidenced.
106.13.2聽聽聽聽聽 Regardless of the certainty in the mind of a practitioner once a conclusion is reached, the evidence presented shall be considered as an opinion, not a statement of fact.
106.13.3聽聽聽聽聽 The existence of any documentation or communications regarding differences of opinion, shall be declared in any reports or statements of evidence. This issue was specifically highlighted in the Court of Appeal judgement in R v Smith [2011] England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) Crim 1296 where the judgment states, 鈥淭he presentation to the jury must be done in such a way that enables the jury to determine the disputed issues.鈥
106.13.4聽聽聽聽聽 The test method (ACE-V) will deliver one of the following outcomes:
a.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Identified: A term used to describe the mark as being attributed to a particular individual/person. There is sufficient quality and quantity of ridge flow, ridge characteristics and/or detail in agreement with no unexplainable differences that, in the opinion of the practitioner, two areas of friction ridge detail were made by the same individual.
b.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Excluded: There are sufficient features in disagreement to conclude that two areas of friction ridge detail did not originate from the same individual.
c.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Insufficient: The ridge flow and/or ridge characteristics revealed in the area of friction ridge detail (mark) are of such low quantity and/or poor quality that a reliable comparison cannot be made. The area of ridge detail contains insufficient clarity of ridges and characteristics or has been severely compromised by extraneous forces (e.g. superimposition, movement) to render the detail present as unreliable and not suitable to proffer any other decision.
d.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Inconclusive: A determination that the level of agreement and/or disagreement is such that it is not possible either to conclude that the areas of friction ridge detail originated from the same person or to exclude the particular individual as a source for the friction ridge detail.
106.13.5聽聽聽聽聽 When reporting an inconclusive outcome, the rationale for this should be recorded and reported.
106.13.6聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall meet the requirements of LAB 13 [88] in relation to the provision of opinions and interpretations related to friction ridge detail comparison and have this included in their ISO/IEC 17025 scope of accreditation.
106.13.7聽聽聽聽聽 The forensic unit shall have a policy that clearly defines the process for the provision, amendment and retention of both written reports and any verbal communication.
106.13.8聽聽聽聽聽 Reports shall be subject to a defined quality check, including a critical findings review, of the examination/analysis prior to being communicated to the recipient. If there is a need to provide results prior to the production of this quality-checked final report, then the provisional status of the results shall be made clear to the recipient through the use of appropriate caveats.