天美影院

1. How to use this guide

• This guide has been produced to support the drafting of a good quality Explanatory Memorandum (EM). It sets out how to approach drafting EMs, and gives advice on what should be included within them and why.
• EMs must meet high standards. The Government is committed to providing high quality information to the public, and Parliament scrutinises EMs to ensure they meet standards of detail and clarity.
• All EMs follow the same template. You should write directly into the template 鈥� do not cut and paste. This helps with consistency and also ensures that the correct formatting is used. Parliament may refuse to lay an SI where there are issues with the formatting of its accompanying EM.
• Common issues affecting EMs include providing insufficient information, using unnecessary or undefined technical language, making excessive references to external sources, and failing to evidence claims made.
• For more information on EM best practice, see the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee鈥檚 (SLSC) . Legal guidance for civil servants is available on (Government email address required).
• EMs are usually published along with other supporting documents such as Impact Assessments and post implementation reviews (of older iterations of the instrument). For more information on these, consult the .
• Your parliamentary branch and SI lead can advise on the end-to-end SI process. The Parliamentary Capability Team in the Cabinet Office also runs for civil servants. The PBL Secretariat is also available to run ad hoc training sessions and send examples of good quality EMs.
• If you require help or clarification about the content of an EM, you should contact your drafting lawyer(s), departmental parliamentary clerk or SI lead. If, having followed the instructions in this guide, you find that you are having issues formatting your EM, you should email the Legislation 天美影院 team at: SIRegistrar@nationalarchives.gov.uk.

2. Explanatory memoranda: basic principles

What is an EM?

• Legislation is often complex and highly technical. An EM provides an overview of the effect of secondary legislation and why it is necessary. EMs should be written in plain English and be neutral in tone. They ensure anyone reading them, with no prior knowledge, can understand what the law does and why.
• As well as helping the public to understand the law, EMs support Parliament in scrutinising the Government. Parliament draws on the information and evidence provided in EMs to inform debate and decision.
• Given the above, Parliament pays close attention to the quality of EMs; low quality EMs can lead to regret motions in the House of Lords, and may even delay the passage of the legislation.

When is an EM required?

• EMs are required for all statutory instruments (SIs) subject to parliamentary procedure. This includes draft, made and proposed instruments.
• Other types of instruments that are not SIs but still subject to parliamentary procedure, such as statutory Codes or Immigration Rules, also require an EM.
• In some cases, an EM may be appropriate for instruments with no parliamentary procedure. For example, where the instrument鈥檚 provisions are unusual, complicated or a matter of wider public interest.
• If you are unsure whether an EM is required, you should contact your drafting lawyer(s), SI lead, or parliamentary branch.

3. Process for submitting and revising an EM

Submitting an EM

• EMs are ordinarily uploaded on . They are uploaded at the same time that an SI is registered and should be laid alongside the SI. If the EM accompanies secondary legislation that is uploaded to 天美影院 (e.g. Immigration Rules) it should also be published on 天美影院. When SIs are uploaded, they are publicly available.
• All EMs must be signed off by a Senior Civil Servant and a departmental minister.
• Before submission to The National Archives, it is vital that you proofread and check the formatting. You should ensure all tracked changes have been accepted and comments resolved.
• The EM contains headline information on the anticipated impact of legislation. If your SI meets the threshold for a full Impact Assessment, it should be uploaded separately and not as an annex to the EM. Further information on when an Impact Assessment is required is included below.
• Once the SI is laid, the SLSC will consider it. The SLSC鈥檚 advisers may contact your department directly about your EM when clarifying, clearing or drawing it to the attention of the House. Their reports are published on .

Revising an EM

• If an EM contains an inaccuracy or must otherwise be amended, the procedure to follow varies according to the degree of change required.
• For minor typographical errors, the original EM can be replaced with a 鈥渃orrected EM鈥�. Your SI lead or parliamentary branch can advise whether changes warrant a corrected EM.
• For substantive amendments, a new 鈥渞evised EM鈥� must be produced. This will be published alongside the original EM. The SLSC must be notified when substantive changes are made.
• If you are unsure whether your changes require the EM to be treated as 鈥渃orrected鈥� or 鈥渞evised鈥�, contact the SI Registrar at The National Archives (SIRegistrar@nationalarchives.gov.uk).

Producing a single EM for multiple SIs

• EMs may be used for a single SI, or a group if they are linked and being laid on the same day.
• Where one EM covers a group of SIs, it is important to explain how each individual SI contributes to the overall policy objective.
• When submitting negative SIs with a shared EM, use the legislation.gov.uk publishing service to request numbers in advance, as this will ensure the SIs are numbered sequentially.
• You should enter the numbers issued into the SI(s) and EM before you upload the documents for registration, and you must submit a copy of that joint EM with every linked SI.
• Advance numbers do not apply for draft SIs with a shared EM, or any SI subject to the affirmative procedure.

4. Drafting an Explanatory Memorandum

• The guidance below follows the structure of the Explanatory Memorandum template. While the EM template is not revised regularly, you should ensure you have the latest version, which is available on 天美影院. Do not attempt to adapt an old template as there are many differences throughout the document. Some sections of the EM template may not apply to every SI. However, you should only delete parts that are not applicable when the template instructs you to do so.
• A style guide is included in Section 6 of this document. You should follow the guide to ensure EMs are consistent and to avoid formatting errors, especially when linking to external documents.
• The guidance contains tick boxes (鈨�) for information that an EM typically requires, and can therefore be used as a checklist, and bullet points (鈥�) with additional tips.

• Departments should be aware that there is a duty on Ministers of the Crown in of the Environment Act 2021 to have due regard to the Environmental principles policy statement when making policy, including proposals that lead to legislation. The policy statement explains how to interpret and proportionately apply the principles that will contribute to the improvement of environmental protection and sustainable development. The five principles are: integration, prevention, rectification at source, polluter pays, and the precautionary principle. You should contact environmental.principles@defra.gov.uk for further information.

Naming an EM

• The EM for all made, draft and proposed SIs must have the heading 鈥淓XPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO鈥�, plus the title of the instrument in full, including the 鈥淭HE鈥� at the beginning of the title (with the exception of SI titles that start with 鈥淗IS MAJESTY鈥橲鈥�), and the year at the end of the title. Enter the SI number if it is available (e.g. with an advance number) or else leave the text as 鈥淴XXX鈥� for the SI Registrar to complete post-registration.

1. Introduction

This section is intended to introduce the EM and highlight any specific intended audiences. The section is formulaic; you should select the applicable option from those provided in the聽 EM template.

Paragraph 1.1

(鈨�)聽Enter the name of the department that is laying the instrument, and select whether the instrument will be laid before both Houses of Parliament or just the House of Commons.

(鈨�) Select whether the SI will be laid 鈥渂y Command of His Majesty鈥�, or, less typically, 鈥渋n accordance with [Insert Act]鈥�.

Paragraph 1.2

(鈨�)聽Select the relevant option from the template depending on whether聽 the EM contains matters of special interest to Parliament. Otherwise, the paragraph should be deleted. Examples of matters commonly of special interest to Parliament are provided in Paragraph 10.1 of this guidance.

2. Declaration

This section specifies the Senior Civil Servant and Minister accountable for the content of the EM.

Paragraph 2.1

(鈨�)聽 Insert the name, title and policy area of the accountable minister.

Paragraph 2.2

(鈨�)聽Insert the name, grade and policy area of the Senior Civil Servant who signed off the EM.

聽 Contact

Each EM should have a named contact responsible for responding to any queries on the EM and the legislation itself. The contact should be the person who can directly answer questions about the instrument. For example, the policy lead.

Paragraph 3.1

(鈨�)聽Provide a named contact, work telephone number and email address that can be used to contact the relevant official.

• A nominated official should be named so that there is a clear point of contact for any queries.
• A generic/shared mailbox (e.g. emqueries@department.gov.uk) is preferred to a direct email address. This is to ensure queries reach the appropriate team when the official is not available or changes role.
• The mailbox you provide must be monitored frequently to ensure that any queries are resolved in a timely manner.
• If you have any concerns with naming an official, please contact the SI Registrar.

Part 1: Explanation, and context, of the Instrument

4. Overview of the Instrument

The purpose of this section is to provide a concise, non-technical explanation of what the legislation does. The section should be drafted with a non-expert audience in mind.

Paragraph 4.1

(鈨�)聽Using plain English, concisely set out what the legislation will do once in force.

• The explanation should focus on the practical impact, i.e. what will change as a result of the legislation and how the legislation seeks to bring this change about.
• Define any acronyms and necessary technical language.
• There is no need to provide a clause-by-clause narrative of the legislation, or reference the specific legal powers under which the instrument is made.
• Cross-references should only be made to other instruments if they are in a group or series.

Paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3

(鈨�)聽Insert the legislation鈥檚 territorial extent and application.

5. Policy Context

This section provides readers with the context and policy justification of the legislation. It should explain the rationale for the policy, including the background that informed the decision to legislate, the choices that led to the particular policy content, and the desired policy outcome.

The SLSC scrutinises the policy objective and proposals for the implementation of an SI, so an EM needs to provide sufficient information for them to undertake that task. The Committee may draw EMs that provide inadequate explanation and/or evidence for the policy to the attention of the House.

Paragraph 5.1

(鈨�)聽Start this paragraph by describing the current situation.

(鈨�)聽State the ultimate policy objective, its source (e.g. a parent Act, international obligation, Government priority), and how the legislation fulfils it.

(鈨�)聽Explain why the legislation is expected to lead to change, and what degree of change is expected (e.g. 鈥渢his aims to reduce the sale of single-use plastic by 10% over the next 3 years鈥︹��^{[footnote 1]}).

(鈨�)聽Detail the nature and scale of the problem that the legislation is addressing, and the degree of public interest (e.g. as understood from the volume of consultation responses, or broader media coverage).

• Ensure all claims are accurate, and that supporting evidence is provided wherever possible.
• Existing legislation, schemes or processes must be explained, not just referenced; the reader should not need to refer to further documents to understand what the legislation is doing.

If the legislation鈥�

(鈨�)聽amends an existing scheme or process, justify the need for the change and outline how it is expected to produce improvements. Where applicable, draw on material from post implementation reviews;

(鈨�)聽includes a power to legislate further, explain why it is needed to deliver the intended policy objective;

(鈨�)聽creates a new offence, justify the need for the offence and the penalty applied; 聽covers multiple policies (e.g. 鈥淢iscellaneous Amendments鈥�), the EM should address each broad area. The structure of the SI should guide the structure of this section. Where this is not possible, create your own groupings to allow for a thematic presentation of the policies.

Paragraph 5.2

(鈨�)聽Outline Government policy before the legislation and set out the ways (in policy terms) it is changed by the new legislation.

• Avoid technical or process-focussed explanation; focus on the tangible impact of the policy change.
• When referring to previous policy, include the wider context for why this policy was in place before setting out how the SI changes or updates it.

(鈨�)聽If there was no previous policy, state this.

6. Legislative and Legal Context

Where the previous section details the policy context, this section should focus on the legislative background, note changes brought about by the SI, and highlight any relevant legal issues. You should ensure this section is either written or reviewed by your drafting lawyer(s).

Paragraph 6.1

(鈨�)聽Outline the legislative context and how it is changed by the legislation.

(鈨�)聽Identify how the legislation operates (e.g. a free-standing amendment, repeal and replace under the Retained EU Law Act 2023) and set out its intended impact on the statute book.

(鈨�)聽Explain the legal effect of the legislation, for example, to implement a new Act or international obligation, or to effect an annual uprating.

(鈨�)聽Highlight any relevant judicial activity such as judicial review(s) or judgments that have given rise to the instrument or informed its approach.

(鈨�)聽Justify why legislation is required, noting where other avenues (e.g. non-statutory codes of practice) were explored.

• A reference to the enabling power is only required if there is a specific reason to do so (e.g. if this is the first use of a power under an Act or the power is being used in a novel way).

If the legislation鈥�

(鈨�)聽relates to any other instruments (i.e. it is one of a group, or part of a series of instruments), cross-reference here;

(鈨�)聽relates to any specific undertakings that have been given to Parliament, reference these. You should include a link, using a footnote not a hyperlink, to Hansard or the relevant report;

(鈨�)聽paves the way for future instruments, indicating what they will do and when they are likely to be brought forward, set this out. You should not commit to specific laying dates without PBL Commitee clearance;

(鈨�)聽may have interactions with Article 2 of the Windsor Framework, contact the Windsor Framework Taskforce (wftf-divergence-jcwg@cabinetoffice.gov.uk) in the first instance.

Paragraph 6.2

(鈨�)聽Indicate whether this is the only possible way in which the law could be changed or explain why this particular legislative approach was taken. This may involve, for example, explaining why an SI is being amended, rather than re-made, or why a free-standing instrument is being made.

(鈨�)聽Highlight if any specific commitments were made to Parliament to legislate in a certain way, including any relevant Hansard or report reference.

• The explanation should provide a balanced narrative, noting the options considered while justifying the Government鈥檚 final approach.

7. 聽 Consultation

This section provides further background by highlighting any consultation that informed the instrument. It should summarise the consultation, methodology and outcome, and relate this to the policy and legislative approach that has been taken. The SLSC takes a particular interest in the consultation section; a good summary can prevent further questions slowing the progress of an SI.

Paragraph 7.1

(鈨�)聽For each consultation, briefly set out what was asked, who was consulted, and how the consultation took place.

(鈨�)聽Summarise the overall results. Include any major objections that arose during consultation, before setting out and justifying the Government鈥檚 response.

(鈨�)聽Link, using a footnote, to the published consultation and Government response (which should be available on 天美影院) once the instrument is laid before Parliament. If it has not yet been published, indicate when it will be available.

(鈨�)聽Note where the Government has formally consulted, or sought agreement, on the content of SIs with the devolved administrations

(鈨�)聽Highlight where significant changes have been made to the policy or legal approach of the instrument after consultation.

(鈨�)聽If a consultation was not undertaken, justify why.

• This paragraph must provide a balanced account of the consultation process and outcome, and should accurately reflect the Government鈥檚 approach to major comments or objections that arose.

8. Applicable guidance

When legislation is accompanied by guidance, it should be made publicly available when the instrument is laid. This section serves as a signpost to this guidance.

Paragraph 8.1

(鈨�)聽Link, using a footnote not a hyperlink, to applicable guidance, or indicate the date by which it will be available and where it will be published. If the SI does not implement or require guidance, state this.

Part Two: Impact and the Better Regulation Framework

9. Impact Assessment

This section gives readers a brief overview of the expected impact of the instrument, focussing primarily on the forecasted economic effects on different groups. An overview of the anticipated impact should be provided, and all claims must be evidenced.

Paragraph 9.1

(鈨�)聽Depending on whether an Impact Assessment (IA) has been completed, choose the applicable option from the EM template. Where an IA has not been completed, provide the reason(s) why this is the case (e.g. low level of impact per business, not many businesses affected, SI maintains existing standards).

(鈨�)聽If you are using an IA originally published for the related primary legislation, state that you are doing this. You should ensure it is up to date and reflects the specific impacts of the SI.

(鈨�)聽Regardless of whether it meets the threshold for an IA, the聽 financial impact of the SI, where it is known, should be provided. If there is no cost, explain why.

• Even when the impact of an SI falls below the threshold for an IA, it is nonetheless聽 valuable to set out the impact that is expected. This is especially true when the impact relates to particular groups or sectors.
• For example, 鈥淭his legislation broadens the Freedom of Information Act 2000, extending it to three new agencies. The Department estimates that this will generate a further 1000 requests from the public annually. Figures from 2014 indicate the average administrative cost of an FOI request is 拢240; thus the maximum cost to industry and the public sector will be 拢240,000. The benefits are from increased public accountability and transparency but are not easily quantifiable鈥�.

Paragraph 9.2

(鈨�)聽Make the applicable selection from the options in the EM template.

(鈨�)聽Where there is an anticipated impact, you should include the headline costs, benefits and who is affected, as well as a summary giving the overall net effect. All claims should be evidenced.

(鈨�)聽Where you anticipate no, or no significant, impact on business, charities or voluntary bodies, justify why you do not expect this.

Paragraph 9.3

(鈨�)聽Make the applicable selection from the options in the EM template.

Paragraph 9.4

(鈨�)聽If significant impacts are expected, include the applicable wording from the EM template and set out the approach to mitigating these, providing supporting evidence where relevant.

(鈨�)聽If impacts on small businesses are not expected, delete the paragraph.

Paragraph 9.5

(鈨�)聽Make the applicable selection from options in the EM template..

(鈨�)聽If a significant impact is expected, provide an outline of the headline costs, benefits and who is affected, as well as a summary giving the overall net effect. All claims should be evidenced

(鈨�)聽If no significant impact is expected, justify why this is the case.

10. Monitoring and review

This section should give an overview of the general approach to reviewing the SI, and outline how the SI complies with legal obligations for monitoring and review.

Paragraph 10.1

(鈨�)聽Explain when the SI will be reviewed and how this review will take place.

(鈨�)聽Check whether there is any guidance or practice relating to the review of the instrument which accounts for why a particular approach has been taken.

• In some policy areas, there is a general approach to reviewing legislation (e.g. through annual reports or sectoral engagement).
• In other cases, monitoring and review is not considered necessary. This should be justified.

Paragraph 10.2

(鈨�)聽Select the applicable option from the EM template.

(鈨�)聽If a review is not required, use the free text to reproduce the ministerial statement setting out why a review clause is not included.

(鈨�)聽If the SI is made under the relevant European Union Acts (see Section 13 of this guidance), delete this paragraph of the template.

Paragraph 10.3

(鈨�) If this instrument is made under certain European Union Acts, a review clause is not required. If this is the case, ensure Paragraph 10.2 is deleted and insert the wording from Paragraph 10.3 of the EM template.

(鈨�)聽If the SI is not made under the relevant European Union Acts, delete this paragraph.

Part 3: Statements and Matters of Particular Interest to Parliament

11. Matters of special interest

Some matters are reliably of interest to Parliament, principally the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC), the European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) and the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI). This section brings these matters together to allow for easy reading by Parliament and the public. Although this section may repeat details elsewhere in the EM, the information should be provided in full, avoiding cross-references.

Paragraph 11.1

(鈨�)聽Outline any information that is of special interest to Parliament. This includes if the information is being laid for sifting by the Sifting Committees. If there are no matters of special interest, state this.

• You should consider this in the broadest of senses and think holistically about matters which may interest the Committee(s). Typical examples of matters of interest are set out below, however this list is not exhaustive. What to include is ultimately a judgement between the drafter of the EM and the drafting lawyer(s).

(鈨�) Further information to bring to the attention of the Committees may include:

• Fee increases: justify any increases above the rate of inflation. State whether increases are also consistent with maintaining cost recovery, and, if further increases are planned, note when they will cease.
• 21-day rule: the 21-day rule is a convention that holds that legislation subject to the negative procedure should be laid before Parliament at least 21 days before it comes into force. It should only be breached when strictly necessary (see for further information). If the instrument breaches the rule, set out why the policy requires such urgent action and what the consequences of delaying the legislation to comply would be.
• If the instrument comes from a commitment: identify how the instrument fulfils the commitment and provide a link to Hansard, using a footnote.
• If the instrument came into force before it was laid: explain the circumstances, and indicate the date on which a notification and explanation were sent to the Speakers of the House of Lords and House of Commons (as required by the proviso to of the Statutory Instruments Act 1946). Also set out whether an SI makes retrospective provision, sub-delegates, or amends primary legislation, and what power is being relied on.
• If the instrument relies upon section 13 of the Interpretation Act 1978: allows powers to be exercised before they have come into force and can avoid the need for too many commencement SIs. You should highlight when an SI relies upon this provision.
• If the instrument uses novel, especially complex powers or could be considered unusual: explain the basis for any novel or complex powers and indicate the reason for their use. Explain the function and rationale behind any unusual elements. For example, if the instrument is a commencement order that is subject to parliamentary procedure, explain its genesis.
• If the SI introduces duties, but the enforcement mechanisms are not included in the SI itself: rarely, an SI will introduce a new duty whose enforcement mechanism exists in other legislation. In such cases, set out how compliance to any duties will be ensured, referring to where enforcement mechanisms exist where this is not immediately evident from the text of the SI.
• If the instrument corrects errors previously reported by the JCSI: state this; provide the reference of the instrument corrected and the relevant JCSI report in footnotes.
• If the instrument revokes and replaces, or replaces a withdrawn affirmative instrument: explain why the instrument is being replaced. If it is in relation to an error, the detail of the error should be set out.
• If the instrument relates to other SIs that are being laid in a similar timeframe: set out how the SIs relate to each other and, if applicable, why they have been sequenced in a particular way.
• If the instrument is related to another instrument which was previously made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972: confirm that the specific procedural and publication requirements for the instruments have been followed or, if deemed inapplicable, why.
• If this instrument has already been sifted: summarise the Committees鈥� decision and the Government鈥檚 response, including the date that the proposed instrument was presented to the Sifting Committees, and the name under which it was submitted.
• For other matters of interest, your drafting lawyer should contact the SI Hub (SIHub@cabinetoffice.gov.uk) if they are unsure whether something should be included.

12. European Convention on Human Rights

The Minister is required by law to declare their view on whether the statutory instrument being laid is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Paragraph 12.1

(鈨�)聽Indicate whether the instrument is, or is not, compatible with the ECHR.

13. The Relevant European Union Acts

This section indicates whether the legislation relates to the UK鈥檚 withdrawal from the European Union and subsequent revocation and reform of EU law. This is covered by three main Acts: the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020, or the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (鈥渢he relevant European Union Acts鈥�). Note that retained EU law should be referred to as 鈥渁ssimilated law鈥� from 1 January 2024 (although the names of relevant legislation will not be updated).

Paragraph 13.1

Option 1

(鈨�)聽Choose this option if the legislation is not being made under the relevant European Union Acts.

(鈨�)聽If, despite this, the legislation is relevant to the UK鈥檚 withdrawal from the EU, this should be indicated and explained.

Option 2

(鈨�)聽Choose this option if the legislation is being made under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.

(鈨�)聽Use the free text section to explain how the instrument relates to the UK鈥檚 withdrawal from the European Union. You should relate the practical purpose and effect of the legislation to the Government鈥檚 wider objectives and activities in this policy area.

Option 3

(鈨�)聽Choose this option if the instrument is being made under the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020.

(鈨�)聽Use the free text section to explain how the instrument relates to the UK鈥檚 future relationship with the European Union. You should relate the practical purpose and effect of the legislation to the Government鈥檚 wider objectives and activities in this policy area.

Option 4

(鈨�)聽Choose this option if the instrument is being made under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023.

(鈨�)聽Use the free text section to explain how the instrument relates to the revocation and reform of EU law. You should relate the practical purpose and effect of the legislation to the Government鈥檚 wider objectives and activities in this policy area.

Paragraph 13.2

(鈨�)聽The relevant European Union Act may require ministerial statements to be made as part of the EM. You should liaise with your drafting lawyer(s) to establish which statements, if any, are required, and insert these into the EM template.

• A list of the statements that may be required, and details of their associated requirements, is included in the annex of this guidance.
• Templates of the statements themselves are included in an annex to the EM template. The annex in the EM template should be deleted once the relevant statements have been extracted, or if it is not required.

Annex: Statements under the Relevant European Union Acts

This table sets out the various statements that may be required under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023. No statements are required under the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. Work with your drafting lawyer(s) to establish which statements, if any, are required. These should be inserted after Paragraph 13.2 of the EM.

European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018

Statement	Requirement origin	To whom it applies	What it requires
Sifting	Paragraphs 3(3), 3(7) and 17(3) and 17(7) of Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising Paragraph 23(1) to make a negative SI	Explain why the instrument should be subject to the negative procedure and, if applicable, why they disagree with the recommendation(s) of the SLSC/Sifting Committees.
Appropriate- ness	Sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph 28, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising section 23(1)	A statement that the SI does no more than is appropriate.
Good Reasons	Sub-paragraph (3) of paragraph 28, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising section 23(1)	Explain the good reasons for making the instrument and that what is being done is a reasonable course of action.
Equalities	Sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) of paragraph 28, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising section 23(1)	Explain what, if any, amendment, repeals or revocations are being made to the Equalities Acts 2006 and 2010 and legislation made under them. State that the Minister has had due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and other conduct prohibited under the Equality Act 2010.
Explanations	Sub-paragraph (6) of paragraph 28, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising section 23(1) In addition to the statutory obligation the Government has made a political commitment to include these statements alongside all EUWA SIs	Explain the instrument, identify the relevant law before IP completion day, explain the instrument鈥檚 effect on retained EU law and give information about the purpose of the instrument.
Criminal offences	Sub-paragraphs (3) and (7) of paragraph 28, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising section 23(1) to create a criminal offence	Set out the 鈥榞ood reasons鈥� for creating a criminal offence, and the penalty attached.
Sub- Delegation	Paragraph 30, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown exercising part 1 of Schedule 4 to create a legislative power exercisable not by a Minister of the Crown or a Devolved Authority by Statutory Instrument.	State why it is appropriate to create such a sub-delegated power.
Urgency	Paragraph 34, Schedule 7	Ministers of the Crown using the urgent procedure in paragraph 19, Schedule 7.	Statement of the reasons for the Minister鈥檚 opinion that the SI is urgent.

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023

Statement	Requirement origin	To whom it applies	What it requires
Sifting	Paragraph 6 Schedule 5	Ministers of the Crown exercising sections 11, 12, 14 to make a Negative SI	Explain why the instrument should be subject to the negative procedure and, if applicable, why they disagree with the recommendation(s) of the SLSC/Sifting Committees.

5. Contacts

Your first port of call for EM queries should be your drafting lawyer(s), SI lead or parliamentary branch. A list of additional contacts is included below where further advice is required:

• For queries regarding specific EM content that your SI lead was unable to resolve, or to discuss the EM template or this guidance, please contact the PBL Secretariat (PBLSecondary@cabinetoffice.gov.uk)
• For queries regarding the publication, naming, and revision of an EM, contact The National Archives (SIRegistrar@nationalarchives.gov.uk)
• For queries regarding the development and publication of Impact Assessments, contact your departmental Better Regulation Unit.
• If you have queries relating to the Better Regulation Framework, contact the Better Regulation Executive (BRF@businessandtrade.gov.uk)
• For queries regarding legal content of the EM template, please contact your drafting lawyer in the first instance, or the SI Hub SIHub@cabinetoffice.gov.uk.
• For queries regarding Article 2 of the Windsor Framework, contact the Windsor Framework Taskforce (wftf-divergence-jcwg@cabinetoffice.gov.uk)

6. Style Guide

EM Format

1. All EMs must follow the . Adjusting the template in any way, including changes to wording, page margins and orientation, may lead to the EM being rejected. Only delete inapplicable sections when instructed to do so on the template.

2. EMs should typically be no longer than 5 pages. It is vital that the EM contains sufficiently detailed description, explanation and evidence, but this should be succinct and non-repetitive.

3. The EM template contains distinct Word formatting styles for each type of element an EM can contain. Using these styles will help ensure that the EM is formatted in the right way. For example, section headings should use the style 鈥淓M Section Heading鈥�, and the main paragraphs within a section should use the style 鈥淓M Level 1 Paragraph鈥�

4. Do not insert pictures, graphs or tables of any kind into the EM.

5. Ensure all paragraphs are numbered, and that the numbering stays consistent throughout the document. Numbering should never restart from 1 except in the Annex if it is present. Sub-paragraphs should be indented, and use bullet points rather than numbers.

6. For linked EMs, you should present the SI Titles and SI Numbers in numerical order. The format is as follows: SI Title followed by the SI Number on the next line; the next SI Title followed by the SI Number on the next line, etc., with 鈥淎ND鈥� inserted on a separate line before the final SI Title and SI Number.

Person, tone and grammar

7. Write in the third person singular (鈥淭he SI is鈥︹��), using active over passive voice where possible.

8. EMs should be written in a neutral, balanced tone. EMs are not political or legal documents. Although an EM should justify the Government鈥檚 approach, it should do so by setting out why decisions were made.

9. An EM is a public-facing Government document scrutinised by Parliament. It should be written in formal but plain English, with priority given to clarity of communication. As such, both slang and technical jargon should be avoided.

10. Acronyms (unless very common, such as UK or BBC) should be spelled out when first used.

11. SI names should be capitalised. 鈥淚nstrument鈥� should be capitalised only when referring to a specific SI (e.g. when discussing The Example Regulations 2024, you may refer to the 鈥淚nstrument鈥�). Although SI(s) is capitalised, 鈥渟tatutory instruments鈥� is not.

Citations and external links

12. EMs should be self-contained documents, and readers should not need to refer to external sources for its contents to make sense. However, linking to the source of evidence provided in an EM can be helpful. This should be done in footnotes, following a consistent referencing style.

13. Web links should be provided in footnotes with the full address visible, for example: 鈥淭he Government published its response to the consultation鈥�. Avoid using inline links and hyperlinked text like .